Mille and Sim stated that based on a qualitative study of physician practices that had implemented an EMR, quality improvement depends heavily on physiciansвЂ™ use of the EMR and not paper for most of their daily tasks ( 7). As a result, physicians have a great impact on the overall adoption level of EMRs ( 6). Whether or not they support and use EMRs will have a great influence on other usergroups in a medical practice, such as nurses and administrative staff. According to Meinert, the slow rate of adoption suggests that resistance among physicians must be strong because physicians are the main frontline user-group of EMRs. Lack of readiness causes weakness of organization to undergo transformation during the implementation of the EHRs ( 5). Physicians have a central role in the use of the EHRs, as they are who provide much of the information that the systems handle in their automated processes ( 4).Дespite broad agreement on the benefits of electronic health records and other forms of health information technology, health care providers have moved so slowly to adopt these technologies. Nevertheless, there is evidence suggesting that these systems have not been adopted. The health care sector is an area of social and economic interest in several countries therefore, there have been lots of efforts in the use of electronic health records. However, despite emerging evidence about the benefits of EHRs, there are considerable barriers to adoption ( 3). EHRs may also reduce the costs of providing ambulatory care. The Institute of Medicine and others have suggested that the wide-scale adoption of the EHRs could be pivotal for improving patient safety and health care quality. Other similar expressions exist albeit with a sometimes slightly restricted focus ( 2).

The EMRs and Electronic Health Records (EHRs) are viewed as interchangeable synonyms in most health informatics. They are means to create legible and organized recordings and to access clinical information about individual patients. Since medical errors are a leading cause of death in the United States and since paper records can be easily lost, misplaced, or are often illegible, the use of electronic health record technology would eliminate many of these issues and lead to major improvements in the health and safety of patient care ( 1).Д®lectronic Medical Records (EMRs) are computerized medical information systems that collect, store and display patient information. In order to: 1) reduce medical errors, 2) provide more effective methods of communicating and sharing information among clinicians, and 3) better manage patient medical records, we need to embrace information technology in healthcare. The Institute of Medicine reported to Err is Human that building a Safer Health System cites one of the most extensive adverse drug event studies, the Harvard Medical Practice Study, and notes that 58 percent of adverse events due to errors in the study were preventable, 27.6 percent were due to negligence, and 19 percent were due to drug complications which were the most common adverse event.

Another word for track record